A comment – as promised

Francesca Recchia, London – My fascination for the idea of device – an thus even more for that of conceptual device – derives from its ambiguity and its inherent complicity, if you like, with the sphere of power.
Whether symbolic or material, power is deployed through strategies of communication and control. I would say that a (conceptual) device is the tool through which this strategy is given body. In this sense, as much as it creates social innovations and a different order of society – to use your words – a conceptual device also generates social conservation, preserving the status quo.
If we follow this line, I would probably think of what Althusser called RSA (Repressive State Apparatus) and ISA (Ideological State Apparatus), for they both also work as conceptual devices in the construction and reification of a codified and clearly identifiable power structure (i.e. the State).
As I said, though, the intriguing side of a device is its constitutive ambivalence. Being the tool to foster the reproduction of a system of power, it inevitably embodies its potential disruption as well. This very possibility is what is in fact more challenging to me. For its very nature, it can become a mighty subversive tool that could allow for a symbolic, semantic, political (revolutionary!?) inversion – or innovation, if you prefer.
Operating at this micro level of shades of meaning is like walking on thin ice. Perhaps this risky side of elaborating alternative cultural and political strategies through subversive conceptual devices is what might make transformation possible, as it operates by twisting unexpectedly what could be assumed as a taken-for-granted vocabulary of power.
Advertisements

1 Response to “A comment – as promised”


  1. 1 Antonio Scarponi May 9, 2007 at 7:26 pm

    thaks francesca. very nice. I agree. Mine are lazy notes a bit. I really have to include also your perspective. which is essential. I really have to post the hard time you gaved me with the interview we have made were we have discussed about this also. I will soon. promised.

    ant.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




Recent articles

“Veiling the unveiled truth”: the conceptual art of Silvio Berlusconi
Published August 3, 2008 by Antonio Scarponi

We all know that the Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi is a man of talents. First of all he is a man of spectacle, a perfect actor from the old school. He is able to dance, sing and his practical jokes are famous world wide [...] We all know these skills, but recently in two occasion he demonstrated also to have great talent as conceptual artist.
...
Made in Sweden
Published July 9, 2008 by Trial and error

On a recent journey we visited two well-known Asian landmarks: The Chinese Dragon Gate and the Royal Thai Pavilion, both located in remote places in Sweden.
...
From motorcycles to 3,5 million pieces of art
Published July 3, 2008, 2008 by Marja Salaspuro and Sergio Davila

Can classical conservative museum structure keep its historically layered architecture, rooms, collections and objects – and still attract the interest of the modern visitors, mainstream tourists and experience seeking travelers? A philosophical reconsideration around the purpose of museums in our era and the architect’s role as a curator.
...

Popular articles

My Sweden: Clean spaces, Clean information
Published June 12, 2007 by Trial and Error

”I dont understand what you mean by street art. If it has no permission, it is regular destruction and should be punished. I think it is equal to destroying someones car.”
Mikael Söderlund, vice mayor Stockholm ...
Twinkle, twinkle, little star, How I wonder where you are?
Published January 3, 2008 by Katja Aglert

Imagine a future generation who has never seen a star in real life. It’s a future when the night sky has transformed into a thick layer of artificial light and micro particles that doesn’t let through the sight of any stars or planets, not even the moon is visible. What effect would that have on us and other life forms on earth? ...

Archives


%d bloggers like this: